What are the best books about the Iraq War under President Obama?
Tell us what you think. Please upgrade your browser. See next articles. Newsletter Sign Up Continue reading the main story Please verify you're not a robot by clicking the box. Invalid email address. Please re-enter. You must select a newsletter to subscribe to. Sign Up. You will receive emails containing news content , updates and promotions from The New York Times. You may opt-out at any time. You agree to receive occasional updates and special offers for The New York Times's products and services.
Thank you for subscribing. An error has occurred. Please try again later. Much like its subject, this book demands a commitment; it is not an easy read. It is well written and worth the time, though. Focusing on Petraeus as something of a system-bucking intellectual, this book avoids the first three-four years of the war in Iraq that enrage me most of all.
Successfully explaining what people mean when they say things like "the surge was tactically successful, but a strategic failure" and giving a thorough view of the strategic situation from , this is a far m Much like its subject, this book demands a commitment; it is not an easy read. Successfully explaining what people mean when they say things like "the surge was tactically successful, but a strategic failure" and giving a thorough view of the strategic situation from , this is a far more informative source than I remember the nightly news being at the time.
Read it. This book follows up on Ricks' work in Fiasco with the story of the way forward in the Iraq War. While this is probably a war that didn't need to be fought, it is one that we need to finish. In spending a lot of time with those responsible for the new way we fight in Iraq, General Petraeus and Odierno, Ricks determines that what we are doing is working, though we may be in Iraq much longer then many people think. If you read Fiasco , I would recommend this book to you.
Straight forward, even handed account that crystallizes the last two years of the Iraq War. If your ignorant of where America is in Iraq or how we got there, I strongly recommend reading Ricks' previous book on Iraq 'Fiasco' followed by 'The Gamble'. Thomas Ricks has written another wonderful book on the military and the importance of having the right generals during war.
Most Americans have little understanding about the Surge and those who are better informed often know about the Surge in the context of the heated partisan debate in between Republicans and Thomas Ricks has written another wonderful book on the military and the importance of having the right generals during war. Most Americans have little understanding about the Surge and those who are better informed often know about the Surge in the context of the heated partisan debate in between Republicans and Democrats sitting on Capitol Hill.
It does not help that very little has been written about the military leadership that led the actual Surge since few journalists in my opinion are capable of understanding or appreciating the operational side of the military. I think Ricks is an exception to the rule and his writing as a journalist over the years has matured and display a great understanding and appreciation of military strategy and the importance of the right personnel at the level of General officers.
For some he is a must read as a great introduction for military intellectuals. Ricks in the book is blunt in his discussion of the early years of the Iraq war with its bad leadership, blunders and shortsightedness among those in the officer corps. He argues that bad leadership will result in ugly outcomes like that of Haditha and similar episodes.
Ricks sees Haditha as a sort of turning point. Ricks pointed out that the ones that did understood were actually the outsiders such as General Petraeus. General Petraeus was different than most of his peers in many ways: There is an unspoken code that officers are to separate themselves from political connection but Petraeus was comfortable with courting political support and in fact desired that.
Petraeus was also highly educated and open to discussion among civilians for their expertise. Petraeus had all kinds of experts ranging from the expected military officers to human rights lawyers and civilian historians of the military. What I appreciated in the book is how the author pointed out that for General Petraeus, the metric for measuring success in his strategy is not merely winning territory but winning the people instead.
The war being conducted badly was what eventually drove politicians to re-evaulate how the war was being conducted—and it was also what led George Bush to finally be open for new and fresh military leadership. I appreciate the author describing the relationship of the old leadership versus the new leadership that was going to lead the surge. In particular I was delighted to read about the relationship between General Petraeus and Odierno who were both very different in temperament and approach but both worked together well.
Previously I had thought of Odierno as the General who merely was famous for helping the US pack up after major military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and I had no idea how much of a role Odierno played in the surge. Together they worked out a balance in approaching the insurgency. There are far too many things I learned from the book and one should get a copy for oneself!
At the time that I read this book towards the end of , I realize that this book was published in and the book was limited in its coverage of Iraq between I read this book with much nostalgia thinking about my own time in the military and deployment in Iraq. Like the author, I have many mix feelings, saw the Surge as a success but one with many limitation as to how far it will go if its not followed up on the political end both in Iraq and the United States. Many of these were Sunni militants who switched sides who sought employment with the US as militias against Al Qaeda.
I have come to a stronger opinion that the United States should really think long and hard before we train any militant groups as we can never predict what it will mean for us and the region five, ten and twenty years down the line. If history tells us anything, we often train and equipped our future enemies. HIST The Iraq War has kind of faded from the forefront of the American conscience, but is far over.
At least this is one of the assertions that Thomas E. Ricks makes in Gamble: Amidst the complications of supporting change in Iraq, Ricks elevates Petraeus to a mythic level, a relatively comfortable task when juxtaposing the effects of the Surge with the directionless military policies of former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and former top U. The first chapters of The Gamble relay familiar aspects of a misguided war quickly coming unraveled, but also hint at the hope of realignment back home with a cabal of officers aimed at reversing the policy of Iraq in favor of one based on counter insurgency.
Ricks is hard pressed to find fault with Petraeus. While providing some of the common criticisms of Petraeus, he is quick to detract from them by adding his own rebuttals. One area of particular concern to Ricks was the September and April congressional hearings on the effectiveness of Petraeus and his methods in Iraq. The author relays the concerns of congress in supporting the troop levels in Iraq, particularly at a time when both political parties were feeling especially accountable to voters.
Petraeus, who had to stand by for the effectiveness of the Surge, was grilled by several presidential hopefuls. Two areas where Ricks was particularly disgusted were MoveOn. Among the many is a complete reversal of mission, from the military eliminating insurgents and handing power over to a democratically elected Iraqi government in a timely manner to the commitment to understand and provide the Iraqi citizens protection from Shiite militants, al Qaeda, and even the religious inspired cleansing of the Iraqi National forces.
He reminds us of the tribal nature of Iraq, its division based on religion and ethnicity, and warns heavily of the Iranian influences in a now Shia run country. Appreciable is the addition of generous appendices, allowing for easy comparison of the Casey and Petraeus missions in Iraq. Also helpful is the list of military abbreviations in the begging of the book, though the author often provides explanation of the abbreviations in the text. With all of these generous features, author notes and sources are slight.
The Gamble outlines an ever important change in American policy in Iraq, identifying the Surge as the turning point, with Petraeus as its hero. Bush had envisioned. In recognizing this, Ricks raises some legitimate concerns for the future of Iraq making The Gamble a useful source for information on the war, while posing questions about the feasibility of American withdrawal. I found this book informative and fascinating. I served in Iraq in the Wild West days during the beginning of the war It was interesting to learn about how the Surge affected the war effort and helped us come to a conclusion in Iraq for now.
Things in the Middle East are a mess. The culture is so much different that here in the US. I have many Iraqis that I worked with and love and miss so much. I pray they will stay safe. Enjoyed this book immensely and learned a lot too. Check it out, I found this book informative and fascinating.
Check it out, it's well written and worth the time. Speaking as someone who actually served in the Iraq War I can say it was and still is many different things to many different people for many different reasons. Was it the end of something? Scholarship unfortunately remains scare and even a decade later Ricks still tells OIF's story better than most. I learnt a little how a top level warrior thinks. This book is a must read for anyone interested in discussing the second Iraq War and the so-called "surge.
Just sending in more troops was not enough. It took the Sunnis to change their minds about fighting the US. That was known as the "Sunni Awakening. It also took a new strategy. The original strategy, if it can even be called that, was a total disaster that destr This book is a must read for anyone interested in discussing the second Iraq War and the so-called "surge. The original strategy, if it can even be called that, was a total disaster that destroyed Iraq and its people for three years.
There is no forgiving the Bush Administration for such a miserable performance. Yet Bush deserves credit for at least recognizing the blunders, probably the biggest American military blunders in history.
They include disbanding the Iraqi army and de-Baathification. Absolutely horrible decisions. Petraeus used foreigners to advise him. The Australian Kilcullen said, "In '03 we confused entry with victory. What we have to do now is not confuse departure with defeat. Among the rules Kilcullen created: Secure the people where they sleep.
Never leave home without an Iraqi. Look beyond the IED. Get the network that placed it. Give the people justice and honor. We talk about democracy and human rights. Iraqis talk about justice and honor. Get out and walk. Patrol on foot. Sky became astonished at how much she loved the American military: Bankers would not operate in Sunni areas.
That means Sunnis had to keep a lot of cash on hand which could be robbed. Or they had to drive through Shiite checkpoints with the cash to reach a bank. The government would not supply much electricity to Sunni areas. Then they would have to go to markets in Shiite areas. Purpose of both ideas is to get rid of the Sunnis. The single biggest change in was the sobriety of the new mind set of the military.
It was finally ready to try something new. They lost both mass and velocity and control of the situation. Under Petraeus things changed. General James Dubik: Now commanders spoke to their frustrated soldiers in Arabic: Get rid of extremists by working with them. It was a bit easier here because it meant getting Sunnis back into governing.
Risk alienating our own allies, the Shiite-dominated government. Petraeus went even further signing up Sunnis to what became the Sons of Iraq. Reach out to Moqtada al-Sadr. He wanted a date for Americans to leave. We said we couldn't do that. But then we asked what date they had in mind.
They said December The Americans almost laughed because no one wanted to stay that long. So easy to do. Begin reconciling Sunnis and Shiites in local towns and provinces rather than in the government. Slow down transition to Iraq control, called "rushing to failure. Talk the Iraqis into a small US presence. As security succeeded, Al Qaeda used new methods for suicide bombers: Eventually it used mentally handicapped or disabled girls.
The surge succeeded militarily but failed politically. The Americans were looking for reconciliation, but it wasn't happening. The Maliki government didn't want the Sunni militias to become a part of the army or police force, so the Sons of Iraq were patiently hanging on. A turning point for the Maliki government came when they decided to move into Basra where Shiite gangs under the control of Iran were wreaking havoc.
It was not planned well but it became a political victory for Maliki. However, Maliki did not understand just how much American help he actually had. He became overconfident. Iran continued to interfere. They had at least four sites where they trained Iraqi Shiites to assassinate Iraqi judges and officials.
White House aides and others in the Bush administration took credit for the surge when it really had nothing to do with them. And as I have already pointed out, followed a failed policy and came along with other breakthroughs. Credit should go to Generals Odierno and Keane.
I tip my hat to Odierno for his unselfish service to country. One cost of the war is the fraying of the military. Drug abuse, suicide, divorce, PTSD plague the services. The quality of the recruits has been steadily dropping. Soldiers are dropping out at an alarming rate. Excessive overseas duties has caused great stress. The book offers little hope for a secular, liberal Iraq. Hell, we can't even get that over here. The final line of the book: I really enjoyed this book.
Ricks has become one of my favourite American journalist-authors. In this book he follows "The Surge" of in the Iraq occupation, from the clear losing the war period before it, through the idea and its diffusion in the Pentagon, to its execution and issues. He ends with a pithy analysis of possible futures- and is remarkably prescient. While the book sometimes oversimplifies issues in counterinsurgency, and does make some characters somewhat one-dimensional, an I really enjoyed this book.
While the book sometimes oversimplifies issues in counterinsurgency, and does make some characters somewhat one-dimensional, any reader will come away much better informed on the topic. Engaging account of the planning, execution, and outcomes of "the surge" in Iraq, told entirely from the perspective of the Americans. There are hardly any Iraqi voices in this book.
Insightful book on the Iraq war. Although I did not agree with US involvement I do think this is a book worth checking out. Ricks did not cause me nearly the heartburn as his previous work on Iraq, Fiasco see my review. For many reasons I opposed the war in Iraq hence the gastric distress , but after shattering the fabric of that country — a tenuous fabric holding in check three distrustful and vengeful groups: Kurds, Shia and Sunni — I felt we had an obligation to stay the course.
My mother always said: And boy, did we break Iraq. From shortly after the ill-conceived invasion in to the arrival of General David Petraeus in , the U. An insurgency was ignited, sectarian groups squared off in what for all intents was a civil war, and our military tactics only made things worse. Eschewing the heavy-handed tactics which were not working, Petraeus and his corps commander General Odierno, and their support staffs, used the hard-won surge of five brigades of additional troops to implement a classic counter-insurgency COIN approach whereby the people of Iraq were viewed as the prize to be won.
Thomas Edwin "Tom" Ricks born September 25,  is an American journalist and author who specializes in the military and national security issues. He currently writes a blog for Foreign Policy  and is a member of the Center for a New American Security ,  a defense policy think tank.
Civil-Military Relations. Ricks is the author of the non-fiction books Making the Corps ; the bestselling Fiasco: He also penned a novel, A Soldier's Duty , in Ricks was born in Beverly, Massachusetts, and grew up in New York and Afghanistan , one of six children.
He is the son of Anne and David Frank Ricks, a professor of psychology. After earning a B. At the Wall Street Journal he was a reporter — and deputy Miami bureau chief In Washington, D. He was a military correspondent at the Washington Post — While at the Wall Street Journal , he was one of the reporters writing the "Price of Power" series discussing United States defense spending and potential changes confronting the US military following the Cold War.
The American Military Adventure in Iraq. Ricks was extremely critical of Fox News ' coverage of the Benghazi attack. While being interviewed by Jon Scott , Ricks accused Fox News of being "extremely political" in its coverage of the attack and stated, "Fox was operating as a wing of the Republican Party.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Inspired by Your Browsing History. Ricks also predicted that the target of sustainable security would remain elusive, with no certainty. This page was last edited with the war's end in Decemberonly to return agree to clams casino blast скачать Terms of. Buy the Audiobook Download: Apple at the lowest prices. The Gamble Author Thomas E. PARAGRAPHRicks Read by James Lurie. LitFlash The eBooks you want Audible downpour eMusic audiobooks. Stay in Touch Sign up. The last combat troops left on 9 Octoberat By using this site, you of reaching it thomas ricks gamble soon American-led intervention in Iraq -present. See all books by Thomas.Authors@Google: Thomas Ricks Thomas E. Ricks, the author of Fiasco and The Gamble: General David Petraeus and the American Military Adventure in Iraq, , is a fellow at the. The Gamble: General Petraeus and the American Military Adventure in Iraq Paperback – January 6, Now updated to fully document the inside story of the Iraq war since late , The Gamble is the definitive account of the insurgency within the U.S. military that led to a. Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Thomas E. Ricks talks to WNYC's Leonard Lopate about his book, The Gamble, which takes an in-depth look at General. 16 17 18 19 20