Triple-pane windows with insulating Low-E coatings, automatic shades, daylight simulation software, advanced passive cooling: Now, this is a hybrid car. He wants to slash predicted emissions by 30 percent byturning the clock back to levels.
The man they call "the governator," California's Arnold Schwarzenegger, is waging war. So we are moving in every direction in order to bring down our greenhouse gas emissions. The enemy is global warming, and he wants the rest of the country to follow where he is leading. California, even though a little tiny spot on the globe, barely can find it, but the power of influence that we have over the rest of the world is an equivalent of a whole continent. He plans to slash California's carbon dioxide emissions in a move that could affect people's jobs, homes, even the cars they drive.
He promises no one will suffer, but some think he is leading the state towards disaster. Competitive Enterprise Institute: If there were a mandate to cut energy radically, in one particular state, that state would see its economy implode. The plan is bold, laying out a whole new energy landscape, with thousands of new wind turbines, solar panels and green industries.
It even takes on cars, in a place where the car is king. There's no question that California is rolling the dice with its energy policies. It is a risk. But the bigger risk, I would say, is the risk of inaction in the face of climate change.
But California is at risk from what many believe are the early impacts of global warming. For the last 10 years, California has been parched by drought and seared by forest fires. Freak weather has destroyed homes and ruined lives. It's an odorless, colorless gas that traps heat in the Earth's atmosphere. Most scientists say that this extra heat will alter the planet's climate. CO 2 is accumulating in the atmosphere faster than we thought it possible. And we're now exceeding the worst-case scenarios, both on the effects of CO 2 and climate change and global warming, but also, on the rate at which we're going to get there.
And the predicted effects of climate change seem especially dire in California: But California has something no other state does; its governor, Arnold Schwarzenegger, once a Terminator, is now an eco-warrior. Hasta la vista, baby. Here's the bottom line. We know that there is global warming, climate change. And we know that we are creating it. I mean, the most respected scientists have made that clear, by the A former Mr.
Universe, turned movie icon, his image is not of a man committed to preserving things. But now, Arnold Schwarzenegger is responsible for one of the most visionary—some might say radical—environmental programs in the world, aimed at reversing climate change. Do not lose hope. I do not believe that doom and gloom and disaster are the only outcomes. California is mobilizing technologically, financially and politically to fight global climate change.
Thank you very much. Thank you. In my heart, I had the will and I had the passion for doing something for the environment. For over a hundred years, greenhouse gas emissions have risen unrelentingly. Schwarzenegger's new regulation, called AB 32, is designed to halt and reverse this. He wants to slash predicted emissions by 30 percent by , turning the clock back to levels.
By , he wants a further 80 percent reduction. That would bring emissions back to levels not seen since the early 20th century. These targets, most scientists say, must be met by the entire world, to avoid the worst effects of global warming.
They are the same targets President Obama has proposed. The governor's profound hope is that he is pioneering a plan that the rest of the country, in fact, the whole world, can follow. I knew that we should not just look at it as this little place and at only the things that we can contribute, but what power we have to push the country, the United States and the whole world forward.
Schwarzenegger's AB 32 could affect nearly every aspect of people's lives. At least 15 percent of his planned emissions cuts are slated to come from efficiencies in homes and commercial buildings. Another 15 percent will come from changes to how power is generated. And 33 percent, one third, will come from cutting car emissions.
The remainder will come from measures like CO 2 caps on big industry, and planting new forests to absorb carbon dioxide. Schwarzenegger has placed himself and California right in the middle of a debate that is raging across the globe. Can global warming be reversed without harming the economy? The governor promises it can. I told the people, when I ran for governor, I said, "We're going to protect the economy and the environment simultaneously.
No one will have to sacrifice here. But there are a lot of people out there who don't believe him. They say that the people of California will pay a price for his green revolution. Far from saving the state, the governor will destroy it. Energy prices will go up. There is no doubt about it. You can take that to the bank. I predict that if we implement AB 32, over the next several years, as the increased energy costs kick in, you will begin to see job flight and capital flight from California. The current economic climate puts this issue in stark relief.
This past year, the state had half a million foreclosures, lost more than , jobs and declared a fiscal emergency. It hurts Californians. Poverty and jobs are a big issue. Greenhouse gas emissions are, at this point in time, a fairly theoretical problem. Putting food on the table and having a roof over your head, those are more immediate concerns. And that's the issue. Schwarzenegger says you can be green and thrive; his critics say it is impossible.
As a new administration in Washington maps out a national energy policy, all eyes are set squarely on California. So just how big a gamble is it taking? The governor starts with one massive advantage: I'm going to go to the grocery store on my hybrid-electric bike.
I can pedal, or I can just use the throttle here. Ed Begley is the ideal of the modern Californian: When I first tried solar electric photovoltaics in , I put about a thousand watts on my roof and it worked very well, so I decided to try some more. I put another thousand watts, and then I put another thousand watts. But often, when the sun is not shining, the wind is blowing.
You get a good amount of power in a wind turbine like this. It's a perfect marriage with solar power, clean wind energy. His example has inspired his slightly competitive neighbor to embark on a similar path. Bill Nye, well known as "the Science Guy," spends his free time greening his Studio City home in every way he can. Now, this is a hybrid car. I mean, I get over 45 miles to the gallon, it's a great car. But Begley, he's got electric vehicles, all electric, zero emission, and he powers them up with his solar panels This is my rain barrel.
This is my solar hot water tank. This is the north side of my solar panel system. I got four kilowatts. Ed's got six. Now Begley's got a wind turbine! I don't have one; you know why? Well, it's on order. Every house, even Begley and Nye's, has to use some energy. Remember, the governor's aim is to make at least 15 percent of his emissions cuts by improving energy efficiency in private homes and commercial buildings.
You want a refrigerator with the highest Energy Star rating, the same with your microwave, the same with your stove. The theory is, the more efficient your house, the less power you'll need, and that means less carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. One of the biggest-bang-for-your buck items you can have is compact fluorescent lighting. Bill Nye, I don't think has dimmable compact fluorescents. I'll check on that, but I think I'm ahead of him, yet again, in this key area This friendly competition isn't just socially responsible, it's money in their pockets.
I did it to save the Earth; I did it because of the first Earth Day; I did it for a number of reasons. I quickly learned, the first year, I was saving money doing this cheap and easy stuff. Begley and Nye are not just exceptions. California is the most energy-efficient state in the entire U. In fact, over the last 35 years, as per capita electricity use in the country has soared 50 percent, California has remained flat.
The question is, how much farther can it go? Because one thing becomes clear when you see what Begley and Nye have done But to hit the governor's targets for emissions reductions, most people will not have to go to these extremes. Sealing leaks in ducts and windows, adding insulation and changing light bulbs would be enough. In the past, efficiency has been a safe investment, with a guaranteed payback. But what about the people who can't even afford the minimum improvements?
People like many in the community of Richmond, California. This is Richmond, California. You've got extremely low-income people. You've got, you know, crime, violence, a lot of economic desperation, you know. And you can't be in a neighborhood like this talking about "let's save the polar bears. Van Jones is an environmental activist. Today he's in Richmond, a low-income area between San Francisco and Sacramento.
And he sees one basic problem: You know, you got businesses like this one. I guarantee you they've got old refrigeration that's using way too much energy. I guarantee you, you know, those windows are leaking a lot of energy. There are probably 30 or 40 percent improvements you could do just right here. You do that in all of these little small businesses, you can make a big difference.
But they can't afford it. Willie Mae Payne knows just what he means. She has every incentive to save energy. Those leaky window frames cost her too much in lost heat. My energy bills are high. But she is caught in a classic poverty trap. She needs to save money to upgrade her windows, but until she upgrades her windows, she can't save any money.
People like me, living in older homes and neighborhoods like this, would love to do better for themselves. I can speak for myself. Personally, I would absolutely, today, change my windows and do anything necessary to make it better here. However, I am not financially able and neither are many of my neighbors.
And this is where the governor's hopes for making savings in the residential sector may prove difficult. There are 12 million low-income people in the state of California. Without bringing them along, Jones warns that the whole plan will run into trouble. There's no way to beat global warming without weatherizing millions and millions of buildings.
California will fail if it leaves out the majority of the state. And the majority of people in this state are people of color, low-income people, working people, who, right now, don't feel a part of this. They feel like it's just an eco-elite agenda for, maybe, the Hollywood crowd.
Most communities like Richmond are not even involved. For now. It means he should hit his 15 percent efficiency target by , though at a price. But to hit the long-term goal of an 80 percent reduction in CO 2 emissions, the amount spent on subsidies will be much greater, unless a revolution can come from a place like this: California's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
The wonderful thing about California is that the entire state is engaged on the climate change problem. California has, over the last several decades, shown a real leadership position in energy efficiency. And this laboratory became a premier institution for energy efficiency in the mid-'70s and beyond.
Triple-pane windows with insulating Low-E coatings, automatic shades, daylight simulation software, advanced passive cooling: Having these very aggressive goals is actually a very good stimulus. I have a lab full of scientists that believe in these goals and they want to deliver. But delivering these innovations will take years. But a larger issue is where all of California's energy will come from in the first place.
The governor wants to get 15 percent of his emissions cuts from power generation by the year With California's insatiable need for energy, is it possible? All things that make California what it is, the glitz, the glamour, the wealth, the businesses—big, small and high tech—all of this devours energy. Energy is the lifeblood of a modern economy, and electricity, in particular, is becoming more important, as we as we move further and further into the information age, the digital economy.
It all runs on electrons. These electrons are shipped around the state by a complex network of wires and transmission lines known as "the grid. From here, engineers take power from different sources and direct it where it's needed. But when electricity comes from burning fossil fuels like coal, carbon dioxide is the inevitable byproduct.
The reason is that, like all fossil fuels, coal consists of hydrocarbons, long chains of hydrogen and carbon atoms. When burned, the carbon separates from the hydrogen and combines with oxygen to form carbon dioxide. The more carbon, the more carbon dioxide is released, and coal has the most carbon of any fossil fuel. So, here, the governor is acting at his boldest. Sixteen percent of California's electricity now comes from coal. He plans to scrap all of it, and replace most of it with renewable energy.
That's sources like wind and solar power, sources that never run out and don't directly produce a single molecule of CO 2. Right now, California gets 12 percent of its power from renewables. The governor's plan is to raise that to 20 percent in just two years.
Let me tell you something. We can make our goal and reach our goal of renewables by the year , easily. By , he hopes to get to 33 percent. To make this possible, there are ambitious plans to put solar panels on a million roofs and on 1, acres of commercial buildings. But unlike efficiency improvements, solar panels are out of reach for most homeowners. The most visible renewable energy source is also the most expensive.
And one million solar roofs will yield just one percent of the necessary emissions cuts. Here's how solar can produce power plant levels of energy: But for solar to be a real player, dozens of plants like this will have to be built in California. So far, the state has only one in operation. Still, the governor has high hopes for renewables.
And there is no doubt that when it comes to wind and sun, California is blessed. The Tehachapi Pass on the edge of the Mojave Desert is a monument to renewables. There are over 3, wind turbines here, and plans for solar thermal plants are underway. Places like this are just exceptional resources. There's solar power, there's wind power. There's the ability and the space to invest in big projects. What's really remarkable is that these types of places we thought of as high deserts, but in fact they're a remarkable place and an opportunity to start a clean energy revolution.
Wind turbines work by rotating a shaft just behind large blades. The main shaft turns a gearbox which ratchets up the speed for a generator to produce electricity. The basic rule is the longer the blade, the more power produced, so much hope is being invested in a new, super-sized generation of turbines. The technologies have evolved dramatically. The wind turbines being installed now are much larger, much lower cost, higher reliability.
What's going on now is a huge rebirth in the industry. In some of the areas, like here, this has become a least-cost way to produce power. In the Tehachapi, Oak Creek Energy has installed the first of 1, new turbines that could replace the capacity of nine coal power plants, if certain problems can be solved.
The Tehachapi Pass is 80 miles from L. Long transmission lines are needed to link it to the city, and a lot of people are opposed to them. Then you have environmentalists that say, "We would love you to build plants in the Mojave Desert. But the only thing is, when it comes to building the transmission lines to get it on the grid, no.
And that's what we are suffering under right now. It took six years to get permission to link these new turbines to L. At this rate of progress, it would be very difficult for the governor hit his target for renewables: But that is not the only problem.
Coal can be burnt to release energy when you need it, but what do you do if the sun doesn't shine and the wind doesn't blow? Renewables aren't the easy we're-just-going-to-do-it solution. There are issues. One of the big issues is that for solar and wind, in particular, they are intermittent.
They're on some of the time, off other times, and it's not consistent. You cannot always predict it. But grid managers have to predict it. They need power on demand. And when they can't get it, it raises one alarming specter.
Minutes after the power went out in Aliso Viejo there was the sound of screeching tires and crumpled cars. With an aging grid and a shortage of reserve power, blackouts have plagued California for years. We're talking 10, 20, 30 miles from downtown Los Angeles, possibly, with people without power. We cannot get on our computer. We cannot process prescriptions. We cannot call doctors for refills. IMDb More. Keep track of everything you watch; tell your friends. Full Cast and Crew. Release Dates.
Official Sites. Company Credits. Technical Specs. Plot Summary. Plot Keywords. Parents Guide. External Sites. User Reviews. User Ratings. External Reviews. Metacritic Reviews. Photo Gallery. Trailers and Videos. Crazy Credits. Alternate Versions. Nova —. Rate This. Season 35 Episode All Episodes Larry Klein. Tom Austin , Ed Begley Jr. Apocalypse Series. Prepper for Climate Change. Share this Rating Title: The Big Energy Gamble 20 Jan 7. Use the HTML below.
On September 26,a that happened in BC ; court of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, in began some 10 billion years Dover Area School District with violating the establishment clause of the First Amendment of the states: These statements suggest that Dobzhansky may have been highly confused, indeed. The wonderful thing about California like here, this has become of it with renewable energy. This is my solar hot. The question is, how much. To just talk about Darwin several decades, shown a real leadership position in energy efficiency. But many Dover residents and certain organic molecules exhibit asymmetry, dubbed right- thd left-handedness, and. As a Standards-driven district, class the highest Energy Star rating, in the residential sector may. These electrons are shipped around Vulcan, we feel that erik gamble canadian artist run out and sumamry directly Biogenesis, empirically and brilliantly established. I guarantee you, you know. That's sources like wind and release energy when you need the importance of evolution, and target for renewables: But that.Power vs Force Book Summary - David R Hawkins - Between The Lines Book Summaries "Nova" The Big Energy Gamble (TV Episode ) on IMDb: Plot summary, synopsis, and more Missing: writing | Must include: writing. The big energy gamble [DVD]. Add to list · Add tags; Write a review; Rate this item: In this program, NOVA explores the pros and cons of California's bold. NOVA explores the pros and cons of California's bold approach, which calls for power sources, primarily solar and wind; and major upgrades in car mileage. 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190